Categories
Tags
-
Recent Posts
- Court Finds Investment Advisor’s Payments to Customers Are Not Exempt From Avoidance Under Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code
- Vitro Update: “Savings Clause” Fails to Save Vitro Subsidiaries From Involuntary Bankruptcy
- SDNY Denies Payment of Administrative Expense Claim by Relying on the Operative Document as a Whole and Rejecting a Statutory Rule of Construction
- Gaming Alert – New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Conditionally Supports Online Gambling – Boyd Gaming and Caesars Stocks Rally as a Result
- In re Hostess Brands, Inc.: Southern District of New York Bankruptcy Court Refuses to Send Cash Collateral Dispute to Arbitration
Archives
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
Monthly Archives: May 2011
Bankruptcy Bullets – In re Chemtura Corp., No. 09-11233 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011) (REG)
On April 19, 2011, Judge Robert E. Gerber estimated Oildale Energy LLC’s $16.3 million unsecured claim at 30 percent. Judge Gerber concluded that even though he believed Oildale’s claims would ultimately be disallowed in the bankruptcy case, he was concerned that the appellate court may disagree with his ruling. Therefore, he required the Debtors to reserve for 30 percent of Oildale’s claim. Continue reading
Posted in Analysis
Bankruptcy Bullets – NEC Holdings Corp. v. Linde LLC (In re NEC Holdings Corp.), Adv. Proc. No. 11-51129 (Bankr. D. Del.)
On May 4, 2011, Bankruptcy Judge Peter J. Walsh determined that the debtors’ adversary proceeding against Linde seeking cost recovery, contribution, and declaratory relief under CERCLA and New Jersey state law relating to the environmental remediation of the debtors’ sole remaining asset, was a non-core proceeding. The debtors had commenced the adversary proceeding against Linde. Continue reading
Posted in Analysis
Bankruptcy Bullets – In re Borders Group, Inc., No. 11-10614 (MG), 2011 WL 1795604 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)
On May 12, 2011, Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn granted in part and denied in part the debtors’ motion for procedures for the sale of the debtors’ de minimis assets free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances pursuant to section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code. Continue reading
Posted in Analysis
Bankruptcy Bullets – In re Teresa L. Somers and Rosemary Caggiano, No. 10-38296 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 4, 2011)
On May 4, 2011, Bankruptcy Judge Cecelia G. Morris denied the United States. Trustee’s motion to dismiss the Debtors’ case for improperly filing a joint bankruptcy petition. The Debtors, a same-sex couple, were married in a civil ceremony in Vermont on the same day they filed their joint bankruptcy petition. Continue reading
Posted in Analysis
Second Circuit Disapproves of Gifting, Affirms Designation in DBSD
John J. Rapidardi, Douglas S. Mintz, and Michael A. Stevens recently published an article in the New York Law Journal on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision in DISH Network Corp. v. DBSD North America Inc. … Continue reading
Posted in Analysis
Recent Amendments to Bankruptcy Rule 2019
On April 26, 2011, the United States Supreme Court approved modifications to Bankruptcy Rule 2019. The amended rule clarifies what entities are subject to the Rule’s disclosure requirements and what specifically those entities must disclose. The amended Rule requires groups … Continue reading
Posted in Analysis
Recent Amendments to Bankruptcy Rule 3001(c)
On April 26, 2011, the United States Supreme Court approved modifications to Bankruptcy Rule 3001. The amended rule will require additional supporting information accompanying certain proofs of claim. The amended Bankruptcy Rule 3001(c) now requires that a proof of claim … Continue reading
Posted in Analysis
The Price of Terminating a Mortgage Loan Repurchase Agreement – Third Circuit Approves Discounted Cash Flow Analysis Under Bankruptcy Code § 562
Mark C. Ellenberg, Gregory M. Petrick and Michele Maman published an article in the April 11, 2011 New York Law Journal that discusses the Third Circuit’s recent decision in the American Home Mortgage bankruptcy case.
Posted in Analysis

